三星Galaxy A35 5G 评测

2025-10-19 23:10:32

三星Galaxy A35 5G 评测--功能强大的全能型产品，采用Galaxy S 设计，售价不到 300 美元附加值。 Galaxy A35 是三星推出的一款功能强大的智能手机。这款广受欢迎的Galaxy A 系列的最新中端机型以经济实惠的价格提供了丰富的功能，并在一些方面比上一代产品做得更好。除了更强的处理能力和 eSIM 支持外，它还首次配备了高级玻璃外壳，就像Galaxy S 机型所采用的设计语言一样。 Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇭🇺 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

三星的中端产品Galaxy A 系列因其极具吸引力的性价比而广受欢迎，制造商每年都会对其进行更新。从技术角度看，变化大多很少，但是，在年轻化进程的帮助下，智能手机仍然能够在前进的道路上获得众多改进。三星Galaxy A35 也是如此。

在功能和性能方面，Galaxy A35 目前在Galaxy A 系列中排名第二，紧随顶级机型 Galaxy A55.在 SoC 方面，这款候选机型甚至能够达到曾经的顶级水平。采用了 Exynos 1380Galaxy A35 采用了与去年Galaxy A 旗舰产品 Galaxy A54.

在外观上，Galaxy A35 也进行了多项改进。尤其是在外壳方面，变化很大。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78Graphics adapterARM Mali-G68 MP5Memory6 GB , LPDDR4XDisplay6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, FHD+, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB , 103.5 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Head SAR 0.436 W/kg, Body SAR 0.917 W/kg Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.7 x 78Battery5000 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, 10x digital zoom) + 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1.12 µm) + 5 MP macro (f/2.4); video recording up to 4K@30fpsSecondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 1.12µm; video recording up to 4K@30fps)Additional featuresSpeakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, wired charging up to 25W, fanless, waterproofWeight209 g

Price379 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice

85.9 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Samsung Galaxy A35 5GExynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080

82.2 %v7 (old)11 / 2023Motorola Moto G84SD 695 5G, Adreno 619166.8 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080

86.9 %v7 (old)04 / 2024Nothing Phone (2a)Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1084

84.9 %v7 (old)04 / 2023Samsung Galaxy A34 5GDimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080

87.4 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Samsung Galaxy A55 5GExynos 1480, Xclipse 530213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080

86.1 %v7 (old)03 / 2024Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GDimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220

机箱 -Galaxy A35 采用玻璃后面板和Galaxy S 设计

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

与上一代产品相比，Galaxy A35 的外壳质量有了质的飞跃。无论是视觉效果还是材料外观，它都与价格更高的Galaxy S 系列智能手机相当接近。

与 Galaxy A34不同的是，它的背板现在由玻璃而不是塑料制成，Super AMOLED 显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护，而不是以前使用的大猩猩玻璃 5。显示屏边框也变得更加纤薄。三星继续使用塑料作为外壳边框。玻璃升级的唯一缺点是：在尺寸几乎相同的情况下，Galaxy A35 的重量为 209 克，明显重于前代产品。

自拍摄像头在设计上有了一些改进。Galaxy A34 的摄像头位于水滴形凹槽内，而Galaxy A35 则采用了更为现代的冲孔设计。与前代产品一样，这款做工精良、性能稳定的候选产品通过了 IP67 认证，具有防水和防尘功能。

三星为Galaxy A35 提供四种非常低调的外壳颜色。除了我们的评测机型 Awesome Navy 外，还有粉色系的 Awesome Ice、Awesome Lemon 和 Awesome Lilac 可供选择。

尺寸比较

Nothing Phone (2a) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Motorola Moto G84 DIN A6 ❌

功能 -Galaxy A35 最高配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间三星的这款中档智能手机有两种存储版本。128 GB 入门级版本提供 6 GB 内存，三星在线商店售价 399 美元。Galaxy A35 的较大版本售价 449 美元，配备 256 GB 存储空间，并自动装入 8 GB 内存。

通过使用 microSD 卡，内部存储空间最多可扩展至 1 TB，应用程序数据也可外发到该卡上。如果不使用 microSD 卡，还可以在插槽中插入两张 2 nano SIM 卡。与 Galaxy A34不同的是，eSIM 卡也可以激活。

在常规功能方面，与前代产品相比，没有任何变化。USB-C 2.0、蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和立体声扬声器继续搭载，DRM Widevine L1 还支持高清流媒体。Camera2 API 的运行支持水平有限。如果您安装第三方相机应用程序，它们只能有限地访问相机的功能。

左：无端口

右：音量摇杆、功能键

顶部：双 SIM 卡/microSD 插槽、麦克风

底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、麦克风

microSD 读卡器 Galaxy A35 的读卡器在使用我们的 microSD 参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 时，数据传输速度对于一款中端智能手机来说非常出色。特别是，它比 Galaxy A34的读卡器要好得多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

55.32 MB/s Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

53.26 MB/s -4%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)

48.5 MB/s -12%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

44.01 MB/s -20%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (22-43.6) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.6 (28.3-52.1) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70 (39.2-78.2) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (44.1-101.9)

软件 -Android 14 和 5 年更新三星为Galaxy A35 配备了Android 14 和自制的 One UI 6.1 用户界面。该制造商以长期更新为卖点。Galaxy A35 承诺接受长达 4 年的操作系统升级，使其能够享受Android 18。三星的目标是在 5 年内推出安全补丁。

除了必备的谷歌和三星工具外，Galaxy A35 的软件功能还包括密码保险箱、三星 Knox，遗憾的是，还有不少臃肿的软件。不过，如有必要，Facebook、Spotify、Temu 等应用程序，《糖果粉碎传奇》等游戏或 OneDrive 或 LinkedIn 等微软工具都可以删除。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy A35 的 WiFi 6与上一代产品不同的是，三星为Galaxy A35 提供了更广泛的移动通信频率，几乎在任何地方都能获得信号。不过，说来说去，差别还是很小的。与 Galaxy A34不同的是，A35 还支持 LTE 频段 25 以及 5G 频段 5 和 66。

Galaxy A35 还提供更多的 Wi-Fi 功能。它配备了 WiFi 6，而前代产品只配备了 WiFi 5。配合我们的华硕 ROG Rapture AXE1100 参考路由器，这款智能手机在发送和接收数据时的传输速度非常稳定，达到了约 830 MBits/s，帮助它跻身中级前列。相比之下，Galaxy A34 的传输速度则没有超过 679 MBit/s。

NetworkingSamsung Galaxy A35 5G iperf3 receive AXE11000

830 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼100%

Motorola Moto G84 iperf3 receive AXE11000

326 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

358 (min: 334) MBit/s ∼43%

Nothing Phone (2a) iperf3 receive AXE11000

782 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

680 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

872 (min: 464) MBit/s ∼64%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

914 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼65%

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G iperf3 receive AXE11000

634 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

679 (min: 653) MBit/s ∼81%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G iperf3 receive AXE11000

823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼88%

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G iperf3 receive AXE11000

861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼97%

Average of class Smartphone iperf3 receive AXE11000

745 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

725 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1362 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1400 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (610-642) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (653-709) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)

室内 GPS 接收

户外 GPS 接收Galaxy A35 通过卫星导航服务 GPS (L1)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1)、Beidou (B1, B1C) 和 QZSS (L1) 确定自己的位置。在测试中，它的精度高达 2 米。

这款智能手机出色地通过了实际测试，证明自己非常适合导航任务。除了一些微小的偏差，Galaxy A35 非常准确地记录了一条 10 公里的自行车旅行路线。这使它与 Garmin Vent 2 健身智能手表一样准确，后者也是为了进行比较而随行的。

GPS 测试：总结

GPS 测试：环湖航行

GPS 测试：转折点电话功能和语音质量 - 支持 eSIM Galaxy A35 的混合 SIM 卡插槽可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或一张 nano SIM 卡和一张容量高达 1TB 的 microSD 卡。此外，您还可以激活 eSIM 卡。此外，还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

Galaxy A35 在我们的测试中提供了良好的语音质量。在拨打固定电话和移动网络测试电话时，主叫方和接听方都能清楚地听懂对方的话。在较大的环境中，环境噪声抑制功能也发挥了很好的作用。在免提模式下，通话清晰度仍然很高，但声音听起来有些发闷。

摄像头 - 三摄像头几乎与前代产品相同自拍相机图像在摄像头设置方面，与去年相比变化不大。虽然自拍摄像头从水滴形凹槽改为了冲孔式，但它仍然可以拍摄 1300 万像素的照片，视频录制也与主摄像头相同，最高可达 4K 和每秒 30 帧。与 Galaxy A34，良好的图像画质也没有改变。在人像模式下，自拍摄像头可呈现迷人的虚化效果，照片色彩浓郁，不会显得夸张。

后置三摄像头仍然由 3 个镜头组成，规格几乎完全相同。只有主摄像头进行了小幅升级，从以前的 4800 万像素升级到现在的 5000 万像素。其他一切照旧。主摄像头采用 f/1.8 光圈，通过 4 合 1 像素二进制技术拍摄 1200 万像素照片。此外，还有一个 800 万像素超广角摄像头（f/2.2）和一个 500 万像素微距摄像头（f/2.4）。

在日光下，主摄像头拍摄的照片非常漂亮，而且具有三星典型的高饱和度。这使得照片看起来既明亮又生动--这可不是每个人都喜欢的。强烈的对比度赋予照片极大的活力，尽管在较暗的图像区域看不到太多的对比度。

在夜间，这款相机的表现也令人印象深刻，与许多其他中端智能手机相比，它捕捉的色彩相当逼真。由于没有变焦镜头，要接近拍摄对象就必须使用数码变焦。在放大 2 倍的情况下，它仍能提供相对可接受的效果，但超过 2 倍后，图像很快就会变得模糊。

主摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制 4K 视频，并配有光学图像稳定器。这样的组合在中端产品中并不多见。如果切换到 1080p，则可以达到每秒 60 帧。

与主摄像头一样，超广角摄像头也能拍摄出良好的图像，然后由相机软件进行色彩还原。但图像并不特别清晰，在较暗的图像区域很快就会出现噪点。500 万像素微距摄像头可在距离拍摄对象 3 至 5 厘米的范围内工作，并能拍摄出不错的图像。不过，后者的数码变焦功能是主摄像头所无法实现的。

超广角相机图像

主相机图像

主相机图像（2 倍变焦）

主相机图像

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image 1Daylight image 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLowlight imageclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A35 5GCanon EOS 90DGoogle Pixel 7aNothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A35 5GCanon EOS 90DGoogle Pixel 7aNothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A35 5GCanon EOS 90DGoogle Pixel 7aNothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A35 5GCanon EOS 90DGoogle Pixel 7aNothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A35 5GCanon EOS 90DGoogle Pixel 7aNothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

最后，我们在受控照明条件下仔细观察了主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下，色彩捕捉准确（Delta E 最大值为 10.47），测试图表显示清晰。在 1 勒克斯的弱光条件下，图像明显变暗，但图表本身及其颜色仍然清晰可见。

4 ∆E2.6 ∆E2.2 ∆E10.5 ∆E5.4 ∆E8.1 ∆E3 ∆E2.8 ∆E4 ∆E4.1 ∆E5.9 ∆E2.6 ∆E1.7 ∆E9.7 ∆E3.8 ∆E2.5 ∆E4.3 ∆E8.2 ∆E4.1 ∆E1.5 ∆E3.6 ∆E5.2 ∆E5.7 ∆E4 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: 4.56 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 10.47 ∆E28.2 ∆E46.8 ∆E37.9 ∆E34.3 ∆E42 ∆E53.8 ∆E44.4 ∆E32.8 ∆E34.4 ∆E27.9 ∆E55.3 ∆E54.7 ∆E30 ∆E43.3 ∆E29.3 ∆E59.5 ∆E37.2 ∆E40.6 ∆E59.7 ∆E61.1 ∆E47.7 ∆E36.1 ∆E24 ∆E13.6 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: 40.6 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 61.06 ∆E

Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5G

配件和保修 - Samsung Care+ 作为可选附加保险三星Galaxy A35 的包装盒内包括一根 USB 线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一份快速指南和一本保修手册。这款智能手机最高支持 25 瓦充电。三星提供兼容的充电器，但目前在其网上商店还买不到。

Galaxy A35 提供 24 个月的保修服务。Samsung Care+ 可以作为补充。保险套餐作为补充，该套餐的有效期长达两年，并包括可选的失窃保障。Galaxy A35 的 Samsung Care+ 保险价格为每月 8 美元至 129 美元（2 年计划，一次性支付），具体价格取决于所选的费率。

输入设备和操作 - 始终开启的显示屏和可配置的功能键Galaxy A35 的触摸屏反应灵敏，响应时间为 120 Hz，操作起来非常流畅。同时，振动电机安静运行，提供精确的触觉反馈。Always-On 屏幕永久显示时间、电池电量等信息，如果需要，还可以显示通知。

默认情况下，手机壳右侧的功能键会打开 Bixby 助手，但也可以在设置中将其还原为传统的电源按钮。按两次功能键可打开相机或首选应用。如果只有一只手空闲，单手使用智能手机也很舒适。这样，显示屏的宽度和高度都缩小了约三分之一。

光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全，一次性保存的指纹随后会被准确识别。同样，也可以通过自拍摄像头进行二维人脸识别，虽然速度更快，但安全性也较低。

键盘景观

键盘肖像

显示屏 - 超过 1700 尼特的 Super AMOLED 显示屏子像素Galaxy A35 的显示屏非常亮丽。在纯白背景下，我们测得的平均亮度为 912.4 cd/m²，高于平均水平。作为对比：A34 的显示屏亮度为 929.9 cd/m²。 Galaxy A34的亮度几乎相同。

在明暗显示区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18 测量），面板亮度再次显著增加，可以显示高达 1563 cd/m² 的 SDR 内容（Galaxy A34：1544 cd/m²），甚至可以显示高达 1796 cd/m² 的 HDR 内容。在最低亮度设置下，亮度降至 1.51 cd/m²。

在任何亮度设置下，Super AMOLED 显示屏都会以约 240 Hz 的频率持续闪烁。敏感的用户在这方面可能会有怨言。Galaxy A35 不提供直流调光模式。

914cd/m²913cd/m²913cd/m²914cd/m²904cd/m²913cd/m²913cd/m²899cd/m²929cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 929 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 912.4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 904 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.1CCT: 6478 K

Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSuper AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"Motorola Moto G84P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"Nothing Phone (2a)AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"Samsung Galaxy A34 5GSuper AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSuper AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Screen1%18%-11%13%24%Brightness middle (cd/m²)904894 -1%1033 14%922 2%962 6%1034 14%Brightness (cd/m²)912889 -3%1042 14%930 2%967 6%1035 13%Brightness Distribution (%)9794 -3%96 -1%98 1%99 2%96 -1%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.11.1 48%1.6 24%2.5 -19%1.6 24%1.1 48%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.82.81 -0%2.5 11%3.6 -29%2.6 7%1.9 32%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.23 -36%1.2 45%2.7 -23%1.5 32%1.4 36%Gamma2.1 105%2.252 98%2.07 106%2.09 105%2.13 103%2.22 99%CCT6478 100%7122 91%6482 100%6661 98%6382 102%6674 97%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8169 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

分钟

25 %

50 %

75 %

100 %使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行了一系列测量（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线显得非常平缓，但这是缩放造成的。振幅曲线看起来非常平坦，但这是缩放造成的）。在信息框中，您可以看到最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

三星对其中档智能手机的显示屏进行了很好的校准。从预装的 "鲜艳"模式切换到 "自然"模式，并将白平衡设置为中等，Delta E < 3 时，Super AMOLED 显示屏的色彩偏差超出了可感知的范围。

色彩精度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

色彩空间（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

灰度（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

色彩饱和度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.831 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.902 ms rise↘ 0.929 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.298 ms rise↘ 1.7 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

即使在阳光下，也能在明亮的显示屏上轻松阅读内容。由于 Super AMOLED 显示屏的最大亮度仅为 420 cd/m²，因此任何希望手动设置亮度的人都无法从稳定视角的显示屏上获得最大亮度。

室外使用

室外使用（阴凉处）视角性能 -Galaxy A35 采用三星 Exynos 1380 处理器。三星为Galaxy A35 配备了三星Exynos 1380去年的Galaxy A 顶级机型，即 Galaxy A54.在 2024 年，这颗八核 SoC 的性能非常稳定，帮助我们的评测机型实现了强大的日常性能，只是偶尔会出现卡顿。

在合成基准测试中，Galaxy A35 与 A55 保持着可观的距离。 Galaxy A55不过，其领先优势并不是特别大。在与 Galaxy A34总的来说，A35 与Galaxy A35 的差距并不大。不过，在人工智能基准测试中，前代产品的得分明显更高，这要归功于它的联发科 Dimensity 1080处理器。

Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (196 - 3803, n=202, last 2 years)

1703 Points +67%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1424 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

1157 Points +14%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

1128 Points +11%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

1017 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1008 - 1023, n=6)

1015 Points 0%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

911 Points -10% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=202, last 2 years)

4981 Points +71%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4547 Points +56%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

3456 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

2906 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2857 - 2937, n=6)

2887 Points -1%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

2592 Points -11%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

2058 Points -29%Geekbench 5.5

Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=131, last 2 years)

1197 Points +53%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1085 Points +39%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

891 Points +14%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

890 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

783 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

782 Points 0%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (771 - 788, n=5)

781 Points 0%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

674 Points -14% Multi-CoreXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4279 Points +54%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=131, last 2 years)

4116 Points +48%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

3349 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

2778 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2719 - 2817, n=5)

2761 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

2315 Points -17%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

2177 Points -22%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

1839 Points -34%Antutu v10 - Total Score

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1465265 Points +143%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)

1407660 Points +134%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

740935 Points +23%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

693939 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

602612 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (434759 - 602612, n=6)

563145 Points -7%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

461567 Points -23%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

14716 Points +10%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=183, last 2 years)

14564 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

13430 Points Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

13393 Points 0%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (11259 - 13488, n=7)

12711 Points -5%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

11732 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

11721 Points -13%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

10924 Points -19%CrossMark - Overall

Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=128, last 2 years)

1088 Points +68%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

987 Points +53%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

784 Points +21%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

695 Points +7%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (637 - 703, n=6)

662 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

657 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

647 Points BaseMark OS II

OverallAverage of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=143, last 2 years)

7391 Points +67%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

7122 Points +61%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

4964 Points +12%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4416 - 5076, n=7)

4630 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

4416 Points Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

4115 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

3850 Points -13%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

3767 Points -15% SystemXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

12177 Points +38%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

11778 Points +33%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=143, last 2 years)

11107 Points +26%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (8316 - 9016, n=7)

8854 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

8843 Points Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

8231 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

7182 Points -19%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

6734 Points -24% MemoryAverage of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=143, last 2 years)

8387 Points +95%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

7784 Points +81%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4301 - 7059, n=7)

5307 Points +23%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

5267 Points +22%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

4567 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

4301 Points Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

4179 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

4109 Points -4% GraphicsAverage of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=143, last 2 years)

24586 Points +249%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

16594 Points +136%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

10646 Points +51%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

8511 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

7040 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (88 - 7126, n=7)

6067 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

4666 Points -34%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

4346 Points -38% WebAverage of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=143, last 2 years)

1667 Points +17%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1636 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

1474 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

1421 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1320 - 1533, n=7)

1400 Points -1%Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

1348 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

1244 Points -12%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

876 Points -38%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

64597 Points +979%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

26315 Points +340%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

22490 Points +276%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=134, last 2 years)

19787 Points +230%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (5835 - 6320, n=7)

6094 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

5987 Points Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

5758 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

5205 Points -13%AImark - Score v3.x

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

33858 Points +6112%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=123, last 2 years)

27610 Points +4966%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288

11407 Points +1993%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144

9429 Points +1630%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (545 - 647, n=7)

596 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSamsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192

585 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144

545 Points Motorola Moto G84Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288

478 Points -12%

正如 GPU 基准测试所示，其 ARM Mali G68 MP5图形处理器，Galaxy A35 还可以流畅地玩对图形要求更高的游戏。与竞争对手相比，A35 的情况与合成基准测试类似，中游水平是该设备所能提供的最佳性能。A55 Galaxy A55一直领先候选机型几格，但也不得不承认输给了小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G在同类产品中表现最佳。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3085 Points +288%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1156 Points +45%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

915 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

796 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

622 Points -22%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

352 Points -56%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3068 Points +279%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1153 Points +43%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

926 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

809 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

640 Points -21%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

361 Points -55%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11204 Points +301%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4259 Points +52%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

3992 Points +43%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

2796 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

2220 Points -21%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

1193 Points -57%3DMark / Wild Life Score

Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4140 Points +47%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

3897 Points +38%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

2820 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

2279 Points -19%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

1203 Points -57%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Points -100%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

6342 Points +44%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5850 Points +33%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4391 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4047 Points -8%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4006 Points -9%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

3506 Points -20%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

13159 Points +157%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7170 Points +40%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

6935 Points +36%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

5118 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4406 Points -14%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

2968 Points -42%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

10622 Points +115%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

6828 Points +38%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5966 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4936 Points Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4321 Points -12%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

3073 Points -38%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

111 fps +18%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

94 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

89 fps -5%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

83 fps -12%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -36%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

462 fps +292%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

159 fps +35%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

134 fps +14%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

118 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

106 fps -10%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

93 fps -21%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +76%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

81 fps +19%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

68 fps Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

54 fps -21%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

42 fps -38%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

214 fps +171%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

98 fps +24%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

95 fps +20%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

79 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

68 fps -14%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

47 fps -41%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

117 fps +149%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

57 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

57 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

47 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

39 fps -17%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

30 fps -36%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

170 fps +227%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

67 fps +29%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

67 fps +29%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

52 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

43 fps -17%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

34 fps -35%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

82 fps +228%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

34 fps +36%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

32 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

25 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

23 fps -8%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

17 fps -32%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

110 fps +267%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

40 fps +33%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

36 fps +20%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

30 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

26 fps -13%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

20 fps -33%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66 fps +230%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

33 fps +65%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

27 fps +35%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

20 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

17 fps -15%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

12 fps -40%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

52 fps +300%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

21 fps +62%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

19 fps +46%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

13 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

11 fps -15%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

7.8 fps -40%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

91 fps +203%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

48 fps +60%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

42 fps +40%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

30 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

26 fps -13%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

19 fps -37%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

135 fps +297%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

53 fps +56%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

49 fps +44%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

34 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

29 fps -15%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

21 fps -38%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

24 fps +314%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

9.4 fps +62%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7.9 fps +36%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

5.8 fps Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

4.7 fps -19%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

3.5 fps -40%

在上网方面，Galaxy A35 表现出色，能快速加载复杂的网站，在基准测试中也处于中等水平。

Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years)

153.6 Points +33%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

134.031 Points +16%Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

131.393 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

115.153 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 121.8, n=6)

109.7 Points -5%Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

102.69 Points -11%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)

76.624 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

69.688 Points -39%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0

Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=129, last 2 years)

209 runs/min +101%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

180 runs/min +73%Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

116 runs/min +12%Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)

104 runs/min 0%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

104 runs/min Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 127, n=5)

94.8 runs/min -9%Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

72.6 runs/min -30%Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

62.2 runs/min -40%WebXPRT 4 - Overall

Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=142, last 2 years)

143.6 Points +17%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

140 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

126 Points +2%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)

125 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

123 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=7)

112.1 Points -9%Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

107 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

74 Points -40%WebXPRT 3 - Overall

Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)

185 Points +28%Average of class Smartphone (38 - 380, n=42, last 2 years)

171.5 Points +18%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

157 Points +8%Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

156 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

145 Points Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

135 Points -7%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (124 - 145, n=3)

131.3 Points -9%Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

114 Points -21%Octane V2 - Total Score

Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=195, last 2 years)

47430 Points +32%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

46286 Points +29%Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

41576 Points +15%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 39283, n=7)

36241 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

36010 Points Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

30733 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

25154 Points -30%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)

18562 Points -48%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)

1796.7 ms * -63%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)

1569.6 ms * -43%Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)

1309.3 ms * -19%Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=150, last 2 years)

1213 ms * -10%Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (975 - 1209, n=7)

1113 ms * -1%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)

1099 ms * Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)

1012.6 ms * +8%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

1007.2 ms * +8%* ... smaller is better

Galaxy A35 采用 UFS 2.2 存储系统，数据传输速度稳定，加载时间相对较短。然而，它落后于竞争对手，不得不让位给 Galaxy A55和 Galaxy A34它们的内存控制器工作效率更高。

Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMotorola Moto G84Nothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A34 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-561%189%92%146%641%78%337% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)529.32506.9 -4%1028.37 94%887.41 68%1688.53 219%3824.7 623%736 ?(303 - 1038, n=79) 39%2207 ?(270 - 4370, n=186, last 2 years) 317% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)270511.5 89%952 253%494.67 83%831.44 208%3642.57 1249%532 ?(103.2 - 903, n=79) 97%1814 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=186, last 2 years) 572% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)244.24195.8 -20%273.19 12%216.75 -11%351.47 44%355.7 46%193 ?(89.3 - 297, n=79) -21%294 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years) 20% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)62.59174.7 179%311.8 398%206.14 229%132.11 111%467.74 647%186.3 ?(62.5 - 419, n=79) 198%338 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years) 440%

游戏 - 60fps 是例外Galaxy A35 在游戏测试中表现出色，即使在较高的图形设置下也能流畅运行游戏。

不过，60fps 或更高的高帧率是个例外，通常只有在你可以不使用某些图形细节的情况下才有可能实现。Gamebench测试显示，Galaxy A35 仍然表现出色。在高清设置下，《PUBG Mobile》以接近 40fps 的速度运行，帧数没有任何下降。在最高图形细节下，《源氏冲击》也运行良好，在渲染要求不高的环境时，有时甚至能达到 50fps。总之，使用 Gamebench，我们在这里测得的平均帧数也接近 40fps。

源泉冲击

PUBG Mobile

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G; Genshin Impact; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø39.7 (31-56) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G; PUBG Mobile; 3.1.0: Ø39.8 (32-41)

排放 -Galaxy A35 具有良好的立体声扬声器温度通过 "Burnout "基准测试，我们考察了Galaxy A35 处理持续负载的能力。在进行了整整一个小时的苛刻基准测试后，Galaxy A35 的表面温度升至 42 度以上，手持智能手机时可以明显感觉到这一温度。不过，从散热的角度来看，这完全是无害的，是测试场景的结果，在现实生活中不太可能发生。

就内部而言，持续的压力无法对Galaxy A35 造成任何影响，它几乎总能充分发挥其性能。这一点在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中可以看出，该测试证明智能手机接近 100% 稳定。

Max. LoadIdle

41.3 °C40.7 °C34.6 °C 42.1 °C42.3 °C38.3 °C 42.1 °C40.8 °C37.2 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °CAverage: 39.9 °C

32.6 °C40.2 °C38 °C35.5 °C37.9 °C42 °C34.6 °C38.6 °C42.5 °C

Maximum: 42.5 °CAverage: 38 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

29.7 °C28.8 °C28.9 °C 29.6 °C29.4 °C29.1 °C 29.5 °C29.8 °C28.4 °C

Maximum: 29.8 °CAverage: 29.2 °C

27.8 °C29 °C29.1 °C28 °C28.6 °C29.1 °C27.7 °C28.8 °C28.9 °C

Maximum: 29.1 °CAverage: 28.6 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.7 % +2%Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.6 % +2%Samsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.4 % +2%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.2 % +1%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

97.8 % Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

78.7 % -20% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy A34 5GMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.6 % 0%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.6 % 0%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.6 % Motorola Moto G84Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99 % -1%Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

98.9 % -1%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.8 % -33% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

65.2 %

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84) Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16) Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.83 (3.82-3.84) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63) Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17) Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22) Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.6 (13.6-13.6) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1) Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7) Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)

发言人Galaxy A35 的立体声扬声器音量为 90.6 dB(A)，即使在最大音量下也能发出均衡的中高音，听起来相当震撼。虽然几乎没有低音，但声音还原得非常好。

如果希望获得更好的音效，则应通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 将智能手机连接到耳机等外置音频设备。Galaxy A35 在蓝牙音频编解码器方面比较吝啬，只有 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星的无缝编解码器 (SSC) 提供相对较少的选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)Compared to same class» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 充电功率高达 25 瓦耗电量在负载情况下，Galaxy A35 的表现相当经济，但在日常情况下通常比前代产品更耗电。

这款智能手机的充电功率可达 25 瓦，在测试中，其 5000 毫安时电池充满电需要约 1 小时 45 分钟。达到 50% 的电量需要 36 分钟，70% 需要 57 分钟，85% 需要 1 小时 29 分钟。由于这款智能手机没有配备充电器，我们使用了一个 Ugreen 65 瓦适配器为设备充电。

Galaxy A35 不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.12 / 0.28 WattIdle 0.89 / 1.99 / 2.14 Watt

Load

4.57 / 12.31 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G5000 mAhMotorola Moto G845000 mAhNothing Phone (2a)5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A34 5G5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A55 5G5000 mAhXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G5000 mAhAverage Samsung Exynos 1380 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption28%11%24%9%-26%-40%2%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.891 -12%0.81 9%0.69 22%0.85 4%1.11 -25%1.259 ?(0.75 - 2.3, n=7) -41%0.854 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=161, last 2 years) 4%Idle Average * (Watt)1.991.3 35%2.01 -1%1.61 19%1.51 24%1.14 43%2.85 ?(1.5 - 5.37, n=7) -43%1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 28%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.141.4 35%2.07 3%1.66 22%1.71 20%1.16 46%3 ?(1.62 - 5.44, n=7) -40%1.609 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 25%Load Average * (Watt)4.573.5 23%4.16 9%4.01 12%4.87 -7%12.33 -170%7.85 ?(3.6 - 15.8, n=7) -72%7.11 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) -56%Load Maximum * (Watt)12.315 59%7.91 36%6.5 47%11.73 5%15.34 -25%12.5 ?(8.93 - 15.9, n=7) -2%11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=141, last 2 years) 9%* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (1.008-7.97) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.12 (2.67-3.43) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89) Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308) Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池寿命Galaxy A35 配备了 5000 毫安时电池，续航能力出色。在模拟上网过程中，该设备的续航时间为 15 小时，而连续循环播放高清视频的续航时间为 23 小时。竞争对手的成绩也相当接近。不过，在与 Galaxy A34在与 A34 的直接比较中，评测对象不得不做出一些让步，因为总体而言，它的续航能力略胜一筹。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

43h 20min

WiFi Websurfing

15h 02min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

23h 21min

Load (maximum brightness)

4h 22min

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G5000 mAhMotorola Moto G845000 mAhNothing Phone (2a)5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A34 5G5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A55 5G5000 mAhXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G5000 mAhBattery runtime-12%7%19%-1%-15%Reader / Idle (h)43.333.3 -23%42 -3%49.6 15%36.7 -15%30.3 -30%H.264 (h)23.416.7 -29%25.2 8%22.7 -3%25.2 8%16.1 -31%WiFi v1.3 (h)1515.1 1%16.9 13%17.1 14%18 20%15.7 5%Load (h)4.44.6 5%4.9 11%6.6 50%3.7 -16%4.2 -5%

Pros+ 高级表壳，玻璃背板

+ 良好的日常性能

+ 明亮的 120 Hz Super AMOLED 显示屏

+ Android 14 项长期更新

+ 良好的主摄像头

+ 电池续航时间长Cons- 最大充电功率 25 瓦

- 无无线充电功能

- 预装臃肿软件

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

结论 - 三星Galaxy A35评论：SamsungGalaxy A35 5G。评测设备由三星德国公司和数码港提供。

三星Galaxy A35 的表现与Apple 智能手机类似。每年，它们都会更新换代，增加一些新的功能，而已经拥有去年机型的人则不一定需要更换，因为这些创新很难让人信服。但是，如果你的旧款智能手机已经用了几年，情况就不同了。因为，这样的机会值得抓住，让技术与时俱进。

三星Galaxy A35 与前代产品有所不同，但仅限于细节方面。它采用了速度稍快的 SoC，支持 eSIM，并配备了Android 14 而不是Android 13。对于Galaxy 的升级用户来说，它尤其吸引人的是其新颖的设计和高档的材料，这使它在视觉和触觉上更接近Galaxy S 系列。

客观地看待其技术规格，跳出三星的范畴，总体而言，Galaxy A35 仍然给人留下了积极的印象。Galaxy A35 是一款功能强大的中端智能手机，尽管现在的售价约为 330 美元，但它仍具有很高的性价比。它不仅拥有明亮的 Super AMOLED 显示屏、出色的摄像头和良好的电池续航能力，而且还能享受长时间的更新、稳定的日常性能和高档的设计。

三星Galaxy A35 不仅功能强大、价格诱人，而且还拥有高品质的设计。

在某些方面，三星智能手机的更新有点过于保守。例如，充电速度与上一代产品相同，仅限于相当缓慢的 25 瓦。此外，该机没有无线充电功能，One UI 6.1 中仍有不少臃肿的软件。

Galaxy A35 的替代品：在其他设备中，你还可以通过以下设备获得 120 Hz 的显示屏和良好的性能摩托罗拉 Moto G84和小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G这两款手机的售价均低于 300 美元。除此之外，小米智能手机的 SoC 速度明显更快，这也为其加分不少。

价格和可用性Galaxy A35 在Samsung的在线商店上的价格为 399 美元，如果您购买的是存储容量为 8/128 GB 的较小版本。现在，这个价格已被其他在线商店大幅压低。同时，8/128 GB 版本在亚马逊上的售价约为 329 美元。

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

- 05/03/2024 v7 (old)

Manuel Masiero

Chassis88%

Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device93%

Connectivity55 / 70 → 78%

Weight88%

Battery92%

Display92%

Games Performance50 / 64 → 78%

Application Performance77 / 86 → 89%

Temperature88%

Noise100%

Audio78 / 90 → 86%

Camera71%

Average80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy A35 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)Review•三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测--经济实惠的智能手机，... |News•三星Galaxy AI 即将推出Galaxy A35 和Ga... |Review•三星Galaxy A34 5G智能手机评论：负担得起的全能型... |Review•三星Galaxy A33 5G评论。几乎在每个方面都比前代产品好

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 159 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 639365 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!